Publicatie 08-09-2026

Facilitating a learning culture to strengthen professional autonomy among hospital nurses: a mixed methods study

Auteur(s): Ria den Hertog, Marjon Wolters-Zwolle, Tjard Schermer, Anja Bussink-Legters

  • Publicatie:08-09-2026
  • Trefwoorden:Professional autonomy, Nursing leadership, Evidence-Based Quality Improvement, Participative action research, prospective comparative study
  • Lectoraten: Leefstijl en gezondheidsbevordering, Bezieling en professionaliteit
  • Opleidingen:Verpleegkunde
  • Publicatietype:Preprint
  • Taal: Engels
  • Gepubliceerd in:BMC Nursing
  • DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-026-05363-8

Samenvatting

**Background:**

Professional autonomy is essential to nursing leadership development in Evidence-Based Quality

Improvement (EBQI), yet hospital nurses may struggle to enact this autonomy. This study examined how a participatory

learning trajectory influences professional autonomy and nursing leadership development within EBQI

practice.



**Methods**:

A convergent mixed-methods design combined qualitative Participatory Action Research (PAR) with

an appreciative approach and a prospective pre-post comparative study. Two nursing teams participated in the

PAR trajectory and two served as non-PAR comparison teams. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected

and analysed separately and then brought together at the interpretation stage through triangulation, allowing the

findings from both approaches to be compared and integrated to provide a comprehensive understanding of the

effects of the PAR trajectory.



**Results**:

PAR enabled each team to develop a tailored learning trajectory combining reflection, knowledge development,

and enactment of nursing leadership behaviours. Four key outcomes emerged: (1) increased professional

autonomy, (2) more proactive work practices, (3) enhanced psychological safety, and (4) development of a shared

team vision. Compared with non-PAR wards, nurses in participating wards showed significant improvements

in aspects of professional leadership (Challenge the Process, p = 0.014), attitudes and skills related to EBQI

(p = 0.037), and self-efficacy (p = 0.038).



**Conclusions**:

PAR can strengthen professional autonomy and nursing leadership development within EBQI. Wardbased

learning, guided reflection, and collective practice appear to be key mechanisms. Sustaining improvements

requires ongoing support for practice consolidation and innovation. Transferability may be limited by the Dutch

nursing context, where vocationally and bachelor-educated nurses work together in teams with a different skill

mix than in other countries.



**Implications**:

Nursing leadership development should be embedded in everyday clinical practice through structured

action-reflection cycles. PAR can foster trust, engagement, and team development, while organizational

support is essential for meaningful participation and sustainable impact.